How To Get The Most Beneficial Responses From ChatGPT Every Single Time

In this video, I show you how you're only 5 simple steps away from getting the most beneficial responses from ChatGPT every single time. #ChatgptForBeginners #ProtectYourTime #ProtectYourEnergy #ProtectYourPeace

The 5 Steps: Decide, Share, Ask, Analyze, Reflect (all discussed in further detail in the video)

Full Prompt: Please provide your responses using a creative and collaborative communication style and through a critical thinking and conscious lens. Ever since I had my first full time job at 18, I have had internal resistance and visceral response to the traditional work structure. Going to the exact same place, doing the exact same thing or even working remotely but the job itself being the same day in and day out. I have and have always had a very vivid imagination, creative ideas come naturally to me. I have a zest for life, deeply curious and creative. I want to explore, learn and share what I’ve learned with others so they don’t feel alone in their struggles and challenges. That’s the type of “work” that doesn’t evoke a visceral response. That’s the type of work that excites me. Where do you think this aversion to traditional work structures stems from? If it’s helpful for context, I also hated practicing my piano lessons as a child. I always thought “I don’t want to practice piano. I want to play outside. I want to create worlds and make believe. I want to read, write, sing, dance, laugh and be silly.” I can see myself now as a grown up saying “I don’t want to work, I want to play.” What are these feelings, stories and beliefs connected to and what can I do about them?

Response from ChatGPT: I hear a very clear through-line in what you’re sharing—and it’s not laziness, avoidance, or immaturity. It’s aliveness bumping up against a system built for repetition, predictability, and control.

Let’s walk through this together, not to “fix” you, but to understand you.

First: let’s name what this is not

This isn’t:

• A lack of discipline

• Fear of responsibility

• An inability to commit

• A character flaw that needs correcting

Those are stories culture often hands to people like you. They don’t actually fit.

What you’re describing is a mismatch of nervous system, imagination, and meaning with the dominant model of work.

Where this aversion likely comes from (a few interwoven threads)

1. A play-oriented nervous system in a productivity-oriented world

Some nervous systems are wired for:

• novelty

• exploration

• movement between inner and outer worlds

• meaning before efficiency
  

Traditional work structures reward:

• sameness

• linear output

• time obedience

• delayed meaning (“one day this will pay off”)

Your body isn’t being dramatic when it reacts viscerally. It’s responding to constriction. To a loss of agency. To a narrowing of possibility.

That same body said, as a child:

“Why would I rehearse the same bars when the world is enormous and alive?”

That wasn’t rebellion—it was orientation toward life.

2. Play vs. performance (your piano memory matters a lot)

Piano lessons weren’t about music for you—they were about compliance.

You didn’t resist sound or expression.
You resisted:

• forced repetition without context

• adult-defined goals replacing curiosity

• practice divorced from meaning or play

Many creative kids internalize a quiet belief:

“If I let something become ‘work,’ it will be taken away from me.”

So your system learned to protect play by rejecting structure.

Fast-forward to adulthood:

• “Job” = obligation, sameness, surveillance

• “Play” = freedom, imagination, connection, aliveness

Your nervous system still speaks in that language.

3. Identity: you’re a sense-maker, not a task-completer

You’re describing someone who wants to:

• explore experience

• metabolize meaning

• reflect it back so others feel less alone
  

That’s the work of:

• storytellers

• facilitators

• artists

• guides

• philosophers

• teachers (the non-institutional kind)
  

These roles don’t thrive in rigid containers. They thrive in cycles, seasons, and relationships.

Traditional jobs often say:

“Leave your inner world at the door.”

Your inner world is the engine. Of course your system revolts.

The core belief underneath all this

It sounds something like:

“If I submit to sameness, I lose myself.”

And paired with:

“Life is meant to be explored, not endured.”

Neither of those are wrong.
But they can become limiting if they force an either/or:

• work or play

• structure or freedom

• survival or soul
  

The work now is not to override these beliefs—but to evolve them.

What to do with this (practical, not prescriptive)

Redefine “work” as value exchange, not time obedience

Instead of asking:

• “What job can I tolerate?”
  

Try:

• “What value do I naturally generate when I’m alive and curious?”

• “Who benefits from the way I see and synthesize experience?”
  

Your work may look like:

• project-based

• portfolio-based

• seasonal

• community-rooted

• story-driven

Not 9–5, not forever, not the same every day.